No legal security in the event of cyber attacks | Pentest7

top cybersecurity companies

A Kaspersky survey shows that German decision-makers criticize the regulations for protecting companies with regard to cybersecurity. Two thirds of the decision-makers demand the same police protection for cybercrime as for other crimes.

Decision-makers in Germany are calling for more support and police protection against cybercrime. According to a Kaspersky poll, 66.4 percent of corporate decision-makers believe that companies do not receive the same level of police protection or support during cybersecurity incidents as they do with real-world crimes.

Laws regulate everyday life and togetherness; fines and penalties are to be expected in the event of violations. They are designed to cover all aspects of human life – including the protection of the health and safety of people in the workplace and those at risk. However, this does not apply when it comes to cyberattacks on organizations. Nevertheless, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) clearly stipulates that companies have to deal with cyber attacks that threaten their own data and that of their customers. In the event of violations, serious consequences for the decision-makers can be expected. The analyst firm Gartner predicts that by the year 2024 three out of four CEOs will be personally held responsible for a cybersecurity incident.

“As more and more cyberattacks are serious – in some cases they even threaten the security of people when it comes to attacks on industrial companies – regulatory authorities and governments will respond with rules and regulations,” emphasizes Christian Milde, Managing Director at Kaspersky.

The Kaspersky survey shows that decision-makers in German companies lack regulations to support cyber protection by the government in the following areas:

. 59.2 percent feel that their own government does not provide enough support or help to companies affected by cybercrime.

. 64.4 percent demand the same police protection and punishment for cybercrime as for other types of crime.

. 52.8 percent are unhappy that they could be held personally liable if their company experiences a future cybersecurity incident as regulations increasingly focus on top management.

“Missing or existing official regulations for the cyber world remain a challenge for companies. That’s why companies have to be more proactive than ever to ensure that their digital assets are just as well protected as their physical assets, ”continues Christian Milde. “As corporate decision-makers are increasingly responsible for security incidents, cyber protection must be a top priority for management. Economic organizations can de facto do more to proactively strengthen their security measures and must always be one step ahead of the growing threat situation in order to guarantee a sustainable, secure future for their company. “

“Companies should rethink their strategy for protecting against cyber attacks. External cybersecurity expertise is an enormous added value and so companies will benefit from external Security Operations Centers (SOC) and their expertise, ”comments Christian Milde. “SMEs should also consider getting a trustworthy, high-quality security partner on board for their own cyber protection. This should provide both the technology and the expertise. Because when everything is integrated, this creates a company-wide overview that saves time and enables cyber threats to be combated more efficiently. “

To make up for the lack of resources and expertise, and improve responsiveness to complex and advanced threats, organizations should consider using outside cybersecurity expertise, combined with a trusted and recognized technology. Consulting a selected cybersecurity partner provides transparency across all endpoints in the corporate network and thereby a superior defense strategy that enables the automation of routine tasks to identify, prioritize, investigate and combat complex threats and APT-like attacks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.